The technological advancements and scientific discoveries from different fields drive more architectural processes. Architectural practice and research in recent years have touched upon completely new fields of study. Within this fragmentation, the main discourse about architecture today examines whether it is an art form, a process/practice or a final product (Fisher 2015). The meaning of architecture spans a large spectrum from Hassan Fathy’s “architecture of the poor” to Frank Gehry’s extravaganza. Such subjectivism has created a professional community that is dispersed more than it is united. A simple task of trying to research a definition would yield countless philosophical terms and quotes from renown architects, all providing their own account or perspective on the matter. It is undefined, unmeasurable, and is dependent on the perspective of the viewer. Not only does the building not disappear, but it has the opportunity of lasting and being experienced by different generations.Īrchitecture is relative by nature. Unlike music which disappears with the sound, the building has the power to enforce its dominance by its permanence (Drewniak 2009). Both aspects are important but highlight a different side of the process.Īrchitecture, like music or other forms of creative works, is based on the experience that is evoked by the sensory capabilities of the user. Representation and simulation, on the other hand, are important as a tie between the concept (or an idea of the architect) and the materialization of that concept, that is, a link between the sensory and non-sensory. The optimization stage is related to the process of realizing the objective of architecture, inherently prescribing the outcome. In this context two aspects of the process of architectural design will be explored in this chapter which requires more consideration from a methodological perspective: design optimization and architectural simulation. The centre of gravity of the creative process moves within the computational man-tool ecosystem, with capital consequences: the instrument, like an “organ”, guides our way of thinking, designing, and planning. Humanity proceeds along the path of hybridization with the technological tool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |